壓力下的父母
2023復(fù)習(xí)正是強(qiáng)化復(fù)習(xí)階段，在考研英語(yǔ)中占了40分，所以考研英語(yǔ)閱讀是英語(yǔ)科目中重要的一項(xiàng)。名師老師曾建議過(guò)考研生需要堅(jiān)持每天泛讀10-15分鐘的英文原刊。強(qiáng)烈推薦了雜志《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)人》.雜志中的文章也是考研英語(yǔ)的主要材料來(lái)源.希望考研考生認(rèn)真閱讀，快速提高考研英語(yǔ)閱讀水平。 Stressed parents 壓力下的父母 Cancel that violin class 取消小提琴補(bǔ)習(xí)班 Helicopter moms and dads will not harm their kidsif they relax a bit 揠苗助長(zhǎng)的父母?jìng)儯潘牲c(diǎn)，對(duì)孩子沒(méi)壞處。 WELL-TO-DO parents fear two things: that theirchildren will die in a freak accident, and that they will not get into Harvard. The first fear iswildly exaggerated. The second is not, but staying awake all night worrying about it will nothelpand it will make you miserable. 富裕家庭的父母害怕兩件事情：一件是他們的孩子死于意外事故，另一件是，孩子進(jìn)不了哈佛讀書。第一件可能過(guò)分的夸張，第二件則絕對(duì)真實(shí)。但是擔(dān)心得夜不能寐起不到任何幫助作用，只會(huì)讓你覺(jué)得痛苦。 Modern parents see risks that their own parents never considered. They put gates at the topof stairs, affix cushions to table corners and jam plastic guards into sockets to stop smallfingers from getting electrocuted. Those guards are potential choking hazards, jests LenoreSkenazy, the author of Free-Range Kids. Ms Skenazy let her nine-year-old son ride the NewYork subway on his own. He was thrilled; but when she spoke about it on TV, a mob ofworrywarts called her America s worst mom. 現(xiàn)在的父母看到了他們上一輩從未注意到過(guò)的危險(xiǎn)。他們把大門安在樓梯頂上，給桌子安上桌角防撞貼，給插座插上保護(hù)蓋以防止孩子的小手指觸電。 《自由放養(yǎng)孩子》一書作者Lenore Skenazy開玩笑的說(shuō)，這些防護(hù)裝置有潛在的窒息危險(xiǎn)。Skenazy讓她九歲的孩子自己乘坐紐約的地鐵。孩子因此非常激動(dòng)，但當(dāng)Skenazy在電視上講到此事，一群杞人憂天人士則說(shuō)她是美國(guó)最糟糕的母親。 Yet in fact American children are staggeringly safe. A kid under five in the 1950s was fivetimes as likely to die than the same kid today. The chance of a child being kidnapped andmurdered by a stranger is a minuscule one in 1.5m. 然而，事實(shí)上美國(guó)的孩子們異常安全。在二十世紀(jì)五十年代，5歲以下孩子死亡率是現(xiàn)在的5倍。孩子被陌生人綁架、謀殺的可能性只有微不足道的150萬(wàn)分之一。 What about academic success? Surely the possibility of getting into Harvard justifies anyamount of driving junior from violin lesson to calculus tutor? 那學(xué)術(shù)上取得成功又是怎么樣的呢?進(jìn)入哈佛的可能性當(dāng)真證明了有從小提琴到微積分都很厲害的孩子? Bryan Caplan, an economist at George Mason University, says it does not. In Selfish ReasonsTo Have More Kids, he points to evidence that genes matter far more than parenting. AMinnesota study found that identical twins grow up to be similarly clever regardless ofwhether they are raised in the same household or in separate ones. Studies in Texas andColorado found that children adopted by high-IQ families were no smarter than those adoptedby average families. A Dutch study found that if you are smarter than 80% of thepopulation, you should expect your identical twin raised in another home to be smarterthan 76% but your adopted sibling to be average. Other twin and adopted studies find thatgenes have a huge influence on academic and financial success, while parenting has only amodest effect. 喬治梅森大學(xué)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家Bryan Caplan說(shuō)，事實(shí)并非如此。在《多要孩子的自私原因》一書中，他拿出證據(jù)指出，基因的影響力遠(yuǎn)大于教養(yǎng)的影響力。明尼蘇達(dá)州的一項(xiàng)研究表明，同卵雙胞胎不論是否在同一家庭環(huán)境中成長(zhǎng)，他們長(zhǎng)大后的聰慧程度是相似的。德克薩斯州和科羅拉多州的研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，被高智商家庭收養(yǎng)的孩子并沒(méi)有比普通家庭收養(yǎng)的孩子聰明。荷蘭一項(xiàng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，如果你比80%的人聰明，那么你生的、在別的人家撫養(yǎng)起來(lái)的同卵雙胞胎，將會(huì)比76%的人聰明，而你自己領(lǐng)養(yǎng)的孩子則是平均水平。其他關(guān)于雙胞胎和領(lǐng)養(yǎng)的研究顯示，基因?qū)W(xué)術(shù)和經(jīng)濟(jì)上的成功有著巨大的影響，而教養(yǎng)只有輕微的作用。 The crucial caveat is that adoptive parents have to pass stringent tests. So adoption studiestypically compare nice middle-class homes with other nice middle-class homes; they tell youlittle about the effect of growing up in a poor or dysfunctional household. 關(guān)鍵的警告是，養(yǎng)父母必須經(jīng)過(guò)嚴(yán)格的測(cè)試。因此，領(lǐng)養(yǎng)研究通常在不錯(cuò)的中產(chǎn)家庭之間比較，并沒(méi)有說(shuō)明在貧窮或非正常家庭中成長(zhǎng)會(huì)有什么影響。 The moral, for Mr Caplan, is that middle-class parents should relax a bit, cancel a violin classor two and let their kids play outside. If your parenting style passes the laugh test, your kidswill be fine, he writes. He adds that if parents fretted less about each child, they might find itless daunting to have three instead of two. And that might make them happier in the longrun. No 60-year-old ever wished for fewer grandchildren. 對(duì)Caplan來(lái)說(shuō)，其意義就是中產(chǎn)家庭父母應(yīng)當(dāng)放松點(diǎn)，取消一兩個(gè)小提琴班，讓孩子在外面玩玩。他在書中寫到：如果你的養(yǎng)育形式通過(guò)了歡樂(lè)測(cè)試，你的孩子就會(huì)很棒。他補(bǔ)充說(shuō)，如果父母少焦躁的對(duì)待孩子，父母可能會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)三個(gè)孩子比兩個(gè)孩子更好。這會(huì)使他們?cè)陂L(zhǎng)期內(nèi)更加快了。60歲的人都希望有更多的孫輩。 Does over-parenting hurt children? Probably not; but it exhausts parents. Hence the cascadeof books with titles like All Joy And No Fun and Go The Fk To Sleep. Kids notice whentheir parents are overdoing it. Ellen Galinsky, a researcher, asked 1,000 kids what theywould most like to change about their parents schedules. Few wanted more face time; the topwish was for mom and dad to be less tired and stressed. 過(guò)度的教養(yǎng)傷害到孩子了嗎?可能并沒(méi)有。但是它讓父母筋疲力盡。所以有一連串像《所有的快樂(lè)與不快樂(lè)》和《去他媽的睡覺(jué)》這樣的書名。孩子會(huì)注意到父母?jìng)兪裁磿r(shí)候過(guò)頭了。一名為Ellen Galinsky的研究員詢問(wèn)了1000名孩子，問(wèn)他們最想改變其父母時(shí)間表上的哪些東西。很少有孩子想要跟父母見(jiàn)面的時(shí)間。最大的心愿是，讓爸爸媽媽不再那么緊張勞累。 詞語(yǔ)解釋 1.get into 進(jìn)入;陷入 How did you get into the industry? 你是怎樣進(jìn)入這個(gè)行業(yè)的? Besides that, I think our life should get into asimplification. 此外,我認(rèn)為,我們的生活應(yīng)該達(dá)到一種簡(jiǎn)單化。 2.worry about 焦慮;擔(dān)心 I have nothing to worry about in this life. 我這一生都很省心。 Today he does not have to worry about making a living. 現(xiàn)在他不用為生活發(fā)愁了。 3.speak about 說(shuō)到 Can you speak about this area? 你能對(duì)這個(gè)區(qū)域聊些什么嗎? Now, I would like to briefly speak about just two of these targets. 這里，我僅就其中兩個(gè)方面的重要目標(biāo)作簡(jiǎn)要說(shuō)明。 4.likely to 可能 Noticing that there was likely to be trouble, the coward sneaked away. 那個(gè)膽小鬼看到有可能發(fā)生騷亂時(shí)就溜開了。 If you gallop through your work, you are more likely to make mistakes. 如果你匆匆完成你的工作，你就更可能出錯(cuò)了。
2023復(fù)習(xí)正是強(qiáng)化復(fù)習(xí)階段，在考研英語(yǔ)中占了40分，所以考研英語(yǔ)閱讀是英語(yǔ)科目中重要的一項(xiàng)。名師老師曾建議過(guò)考研生需要堅(jiān)持每天泛讀10-15分鐘的英文原刊。強(qiáng)烈推薦了雜志《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)人》.雜志中的文章也是考研英語(yǔ)的主要材料來(lái)源.希望考研考生認(rèn)真閱讀，快速提高考研英語(yǔ)閱讀水平。 Stressed parents 壓力下的父母 Cancel that violin class 取消小提琴補(bǔ)習(xí)班 Helicopter moms and dads will not harm their kidsif they relax a bit 揠苗助長(zhǎng)的父母?jìng)儯潘牲c(diǎn)，對(duì)孩子沒(méi)壞處。 WELL-TO-DO parents fear two things: that theirchildren will die in a freak accident, and that they will not get into Harvard. The first fear iswildly exaggerated. The second is not, but staying awake all night worrying about it will nothelpand it will make you miserable. 富裕家庭的父母害怕兩件事情：一件是他們的孩子死于意外事故，另一件是，孩子進(jìn)不了哈佛讀書。第一件可能過(guò)分的夸張，第二件則絕對(duì)真實(shí)。但是擔(dān)心得夜不能寐起不到任何幫助作用，只會(huì)讓你覺(jué)得痛苦。 Modern parents see risks that their own parents never considered. They put gates at the topof stairs, affix cushions to table corners and jam plastic guards into sockets to stop smallfingers from getting electrocuted. Those guards are potential choking hazards, jests LenoreSkenazy, the author of Free-Range Kids. Ms Skenazy let her nine-year-old son ride the NewYork subway on his own. He was thrilled; but when she spoke about it on TV, a mob ofworrywarts called her America s worst mom. 現(xiàn)在的父母看到了他們上一輩從未注意到過(guò)的危險(xiǎn)。他們把大門安在樓梯頂上，給桌子安上桌角防撞貼，給插座插上保護(hù)蓋以防止孩子的小手指觸電。 《自由放養(yǎng)孩子》一書作者Lenore Skenazy開玩笑的說(shuō)，這些防護(hù)裝置有潛在的窒息危險(xiǎn)。Skenazy讓她九歲的孩子自己乘坐紐約的地鐵。孩子因此非常激動(dòng)，但當(dāng)Skenazy在電視上講到此事，一群杞人憂天人士則說(shuō)她是美國(guó)最糟糕的母親。 Yet in fact American children are staggeringly safe. A kid under five in the 1950s was fivetimes as likely to die than the same kid today. The chance of a child being kidnapped andmurdered by a stranger is a minuscule one in 1.5m. 然而，事實(shí)上美國(guó)的孩子們異常安全。在二十世紀(jì)五十年代，5歲以下孩子死亡率是現(xiàn)在的5倍。孩子被陌生人綁架、謀殺的可能性只有微不足道的150萬(wàn)分之一。 What about academic success? Surely the possibility of getting into Harvard justifies anyamount of driving junior from violin lesson to calculus tutor? 那學(xué)術(shù)上取得成功又是怎么樣的呢?進(jìn)入哈佛的可能性當(dāng)真證明了有從小提琴到微積分都很厲害的孩子? Bryan Caplan, an economist at George Mason University, says it does not. In Selfish ReasonsTo Have More Kids, he points to evidence that genes matter far more than parenting. AMinnesota study found that identical twins grow up to be similarly clever regardless ofwhether they are raised in the same household or in separate ones. Studies in Texas andColorado found that children adopted by high-IQ families were no smarter than those adoptedby average families. A Dutch study found that if you are smarter than 80% of thepopulation, you should expect your identical twin raised in another home to be smarterthan 76% but your adopted sibling to be average. Other twin and adopted studies find thatgenes have a huge influence on academic and financial success, while parenting has only amodest effect. 喬治梅森大學(xué)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家Bryan Caplan說(shuō)，事實(shí)并非如此。在《多要孩子的自私原因》一書中，他拿出證據(jù)指出，基因的影響力遠(yuǎn)大于教養(yǎng)的影響力。明尼蘇達(dá)州的一項(xiàng)研究表明，同卵雙胞胎不論是否在同一家庭環(huán)境中成長(zhǎng)，他們長(zhǎng)大后的聰慧程度是相似的。德克薩斯州和科羅拉多州的研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，被高智商家庭收養(yǎng)的孩子并沒(méi)有比普通家庭收養(yǎng)的孩子聰明。荷蘭一項(xiàng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，如果你比80%的人聰明，那么你生的、在別的人家撫養(yǎng)起來(lái)的同卵雙胞胎，將會(huì)比76%的人聰明，而你自己領(lǐng)養(yǎng)的孩子則是平均水平。其他關(guān)于雙胞胎和領(lǐng)養(yǎng)的研究顯示，基因?qū)W(xué)術(shù)和經(jīng)濟(jì)上的成功有著巨大的影響，而教養(yǎng)只有輕微的作用。 The crucial caveat is that adoptive parents have to pass stringent tests. So adoption studiestypically compare nice middle-class homes with other nice middle-class homes; they tell youlittle about the effect of growing up in a poor or dysfunctional household. 關(guān)鍵的警告是，養(yǎng)父母必須經(jīng)過(guò)嚴(yán)格的測(cè)試。因此，領(lǐng)養(yǎng)研究通常在不錯(cuò)的中產(chǎn)家庭之間比較，并沒(méi)有說(shuō)明在貧窮或非正常家庭中成長(zhǎng)會(huì)有什么影響。 The moral, for Mr Caplan, is that middle-class parents should relax a bit, cancel a violin classor two and let their kids play outside. If your parenting style passes the laugh test, your kidswill be fine, he writes. He adds that if parents fretted less about each child, they might find itless daunting to have three instead of two. And that might make them happier in the longrun. No 60-year-old ever wished for fewer grandchildren. 對(duì)Caplan來(lái)說(shuō)，其意義就是中產(chǎn)家庭父母應(yīng)當(dāng)放松點(diǎn)，取消一兩個(gè)小提琴班，讓孩子在外面玩玩。他在書中寫到：如果你的養(yǎng)育形式通過(guò)了歡樂(lè)測(cè)試，你的孩子就會(huì)很棒。他補(bǔ)充說(shuō)，如果父母少焦躁的對(duì)待孩子，父母可能會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)三個(gè)孩子比兩個(gè)孩子更好。這會(huì)使他們?cè)陂L(zhǎng)期內(nèi)更加快了。60歲的人都希望有更多的孫輩。 Does over-parenting hurt children? Probably not; but it exhausts parents. Hence the cascadeof books with titles like All Joy And No Fun and Go The Fk To Sleep. Kids notice whentheir parents are overdoing it. Ellen Galinsky, a researcher, asked 1,000 kids what theywould most like to change about their parents schedules. Few wanted more face time; the topwish was for mom and dad to be less tired and stressed. 過(guò)度的教養(yǎng)傷害到孩子了嗎?可能并沒(méi)有。但是它讓父母筋疲力盡。所以有一連串像《所有的快樂(lè)與不快樂(lè)》和《去他媽的睡覺(jué)》這樣的書名。孩子會(huì)注意到父母?jìng)兪裁磿r(shí)候過(guò)頭了。一名為Ellen Galinsky的研究員詢問(wèn)了1000名孩子，問(wèn)他們最想改變其父母時(shí)間表上的哪些東西。很少有孩子想要跟父母見(jiàn)面的時(shí)間。最大的心愿是，讓爸爸媽媽不再那么緊張勞累。 詞語(yǔ)解釋 1.get into 進(jìn)入;陷入 How did you get into the industry? 你是怎樣進(jìn)入這個(gè)行業(yè)的? Besides that, I think our life should get into asimplification. 此外,我認(rèn)為,我們的生活應(yīng)該達(dá)到一種簡(jiǎn)單化。 2.worry about 焦慮;擔(dān)心 I have nothing to worry about in this life. 我這一生都很省心。 Today he does not have to worry about making a living. 現(xiàn)在他不用為生活發(fā)愁了。 3.speak about 說(shuō)到 Can you speak about this area? 你能對(duì)這個(gè)區(qū)域聊些什么嗎? Now, I would like to briefly speak about just two of these targets. 這里，我僅就其中兩個(gè)方面的重要目標(biāo)作簡(jiǎn)要說(shuō)明。 4.likely to 可能 Noticing that there was likely to be trouble, the coward sneaked away. 那個(gè)膽小鬼看到有可能發(fā)生騷亂時(shí)就溜開了。 If you gallop through your work, you are more likely to make mistakes. 如果你匆匆完成你的工作，你就更可能出錯(cuò)了。
