GRE出國考試寫作指導:孫遠作文筆記
第四天 6.24
6. post hoc , ergo prepter hoc = after this , therefore because of this
P46 47 , P55 81
7. concurrence P36 5 , P50 61
8. incomplete comparison or selective comparison P54 78
9. composition and division
composition: 把個體特征不恰當?shù)囊浦驳秸w上
division: 把群體特征簡單的移植到個體上
P48 55
最后段的寫作：
兩項任務：
1. 指出原論者未能有效的支持自己的結(jié)論
2. 指出原論者可以從正文分析的幾個方面加強原論證。
針對正文幾個topic sentence 應在這幾個方面加強
Module: p75-p79
Issue
Strategy: P67
選題：
構(gòu)思：brainstorm
開頭：陳述問題背景，指出自己論點
正文：2~3 段，分別支持自己立場
1. 每段要有一個主題
2. 展開論述
3. 復雜性，讓步，修正
4. 使用信號詞
結(jié)尾：
語言問題： check P68
Brainstorm 快速構(gòu)思
1. 從大腦里調(diào)出盡可能多的相關(guān)信息
2. 充分relax
3. 快速記憶
Issue的典型立場
Agree P104 3
Disagree P108 47
閃光句型:結(jié)論
1. to sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility cause the evidence cited in the
analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To
strengthen the argument, the arguer would have to provide more evidence
concerning
2. moreover, it would be necessary for the arguer to rule out all the
above-mentioned possibilities before we can better evaluate the argument.
3. As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically
acceptable, the arguer would have to demonstrate that
4. additionally, the arguer must provide evidence to rule out other possible
causes
5. To conclude, this argument is not persuasive as it stands. Before we accept
the conclusion, the arguer must present more facts to demonstrate that
6. To solidify the argument, the arguer would have to produce more evidence
concerning
7. In summary, the conclusion reached in this argument is invalid and
misleading. To make the argument more convincing, the arguer would have
to prove that
8. Moreover, I would suspend my judgment about the credibility of the
recommendation until the arguer can provide concrete evidence that
第四天 6.24
6. post hoc , ergo prepter hoc = after this , therefore because of this
P46 47 , P55 81
7. concurrence P36 5 , P50 61
8. incomplete comparison or selective comparison P54 78
9. composition and division
composition: 把個體特征不恰當?shù)囊浦驳秸w上
division: 把群體特征簡單的移植到個體上
P48 55
最后段的寫作：
兩項任務：
1. 指出原論者未能有效的支持自己的結(jié)論
2. 指出原論者可以從正文分析的幾個方面加強原論證。
針對正文幾個topic sentence 應在這幾個方面加強
Module: p75-p79
Issue
Strategy: P67
選題：
構(gòu)思：brainstorm
開頭：陳述問題背景，指出自己論點
正文：2~3 段，分別支持自己立場
1. 每段要有一個主題
2. 展開論述
3. 復雜性，讓步，修正
4. 使用信號詞
結(jié)尾：
語言問題： check P68
Brainstorm 快速構(gòu)思
1. 從大腦里調(diào)出盡可能多的相關(guān)信息
2. 充分relax
3. 快速記憶
Issue的典型立場
Agree P104 3
Disagree P108 47
閃光句型:結(jié)論
1. to sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility cause the evidence cited in the
analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To
strengthen the argument, the arguer would have to provide more evidence
concerning
2. moreover, it would be necessary for the arguer to rule out all the
above-mentioned possibilities before we can better evaluate the argument.
3. As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically
acceptable, the arguer would have to demonstrate that
4. additionally, the arguer must provide evidence to rule out other possible
causes
5. To conclude, this argument is not persuasive as it stands. Before we accept
the conclusion, the arguer must present more facts to demonstrate that
6. To solidify the argument, the arguer would have to produce more evidence
concerning
7. In summary, the conclusion reached in this argument is invalid and
misleading. To make the argument more convincing, the arguer would have
to prove that
8. Moreover, I would suspend my judgment about the credibility of the
recommendation until the arguer can provide concrete evidence that
