雅思大作文點評：學生是否應上私立中學？
Some people think students should go to private secondary schools. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
More attention has been paid to education, playing a vital role in every field （首先，這個非謂語動詞詞組讀上去感覺不是很順，再仔細一想，它到底是修飾誰呢？從語法上來說，似乎沒有問題，但從意思表達上來說，表達不清） , by the whole society, especially parents. It is not surprising that a burning problem （這個 burning 用的很不錯，大家學習一下，比如 a burning interest （強烈的興趣愛好，即酷愛） in science ； I had a burning ambition （強烈的野心，即雄心勃勃） to become a journalist ； The burning question （嚴重的，緊急的問題） in this years debate over the federal budget is: whose taxes should be raised? ） for parents is whether they should send their offspring to private secondary schools. I suggest that children should go to private schools if parents can afford the expensive tuition.
結構分析：思路很清晰。前兩句話是引題，最后一句話鮮明地表達自己的觀點。而且在這一段就感覺句型比較豐富，不錯。
語言分析：感覺這位作者的英語水平應該不錯，通過某些句型和詞匯的使用，讓我有更高的期待，呵呵。。。
Admittedly, compared with private schools, tuition in public ones （這個錯誤很細小，主要是受了中文干擾，犯了邏輯主語不一致的錯誤！根據作者的表達， tuition in public schools 和 private schools 在比較，即學費和學校比了，不是學費和學費比了！ Understand?! 而且，用 tuition 作主語，后面的謂語是 be free of charge 也是搭配不當的！應改為 compared with private schools, public schools are free of charge ） is free of charge, and then it brings no financial burden to families, more attractive to not wealthy enough ones . In addition, public schools, as usually （這個居然也錯！該打，應該為 as usual ） , are closer and students can spend less time, in the case of frequent traffic congestion nowadays, on everyday commute between the school and home.
But, more importantly, private schools have an upper hand in education quality, the underlying ingredient （這里相比之下，我覺得用 element 更好） in school assessment. Fewer students in each class share the resources, and, in the meantime, each is taken more care of by teachers, who, due to meritocracy （這個的短語在這里很莫名！！！） , are more accountable and learned, lifting the teaching efficiency and providing a better environment that is favorable for teenagers individuality development. In other words, they have to guarantee the teaching quality to enroll enough students, surviving the society （這里寫得有點混亂，不知道想表達什么意思！） .
Not only do private schools offer children a chance to receive education of a higher standard, but also fuel a rise, on the average, in the level of education. （這種句子多寫點，那么 8 分就跑不掉了，呵呵。。。非常好的句子！！！） Supposing that rapidly increasing students choose private schools rather than public ones, public schools, although they have annual limited education fund, are compelled to improve their education quality to ensure adequate applicants and escape the bad fortune closing their doors （估計又是受中文影響，寫出這樣的句子，稍微改改就對了） ,because of financial difficulties.
Most visibly, the blooming private schools justify the choice that children go to private ones （這句寫得很變扭，關鍵是想用 justify 這個詞后面加句子，所以導致的結果就是很不順。可以寫成： justify the students choice ，既簡潔又明了） . That paves the way for childrens promising future.
總評：大家可以看出這篇文章，紅點地方很多 ；藍的地方也有（因為寫得很好，可以學習）。
看下來的感覺是，作者的英語水平真的很不錯，寫成這樣真的已經很少人能做到了！那么有學生可能會問，寫得不錯怎么還那么多不妥的地方？！這就是為什么到現在也沒見有活人寫作考 9 分！因為，總是有這種或那種不妥之處！
此文 7 分。
Some people think students should go to private secondary schools. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
More attention has been paid to education, playing a vital role in every field （首先，這個非謂語動詞詞組讀上去感覺不是很順，再仔細一想，它到底是修飾誰呢？從語法上來說，似乎沒有問題，但從意思表達上來說，表達不清） , by the whole society, especially parents. It is not surprising that a burning problem （這個 burning 用的很不錯，大家學習一下，比如 a burning interest （強烈的興趣愛好，即酷愛） in science ； I had a burning ambition （強烈的野心，即雄心勃勃） to become a journalist ； The burning question （嚴重的，緊急的問題） in this years debate over the federal budget is: whose taxes should be raised? ） for parents is whether they should send their offspring to private secondary schools. I suggest that children should go to private schools if parents can afford the expensive tuition.
結構分析：思路很清晰。前兩句話是引題，最后一句話鮮明地表達自己的觀點。而且在這一段就感覺句型比較豐富，不錯。
語言分析：感覺這位作者的英語水平應該不錯，通過某些句型和詞匯的使用，讓我有更高的期待，呵呵。。。
Admittedly, compared with private schools, tuition in public ones （這個錯誤很細小，主要是受了中文干擾，犯了邏輯主語不一致的錯誤！根據作者的表達， tuition in public schools 和 private schools 在比較，即學費和學校比了，不是學費和學費比了！ Understand?! 而且，用 tuition 作主語，后面的謂語是 be free of charge 也是搭配不當的！應改為 compared with private schools, public schools are free of charge ） is free of charge, and then it brings no financial burden to families, more attractive to not wealthy enough ones . In addition, public schools, as usually （這個居然也錯！該打，應該為 as usual ） , are closer and students can spend less time, in the case of frequent traffic congestion nowadays, on everyday commute between the school and home.
But, more importantly, private schools have an upper hand in education quality, the underlying ingredient （這里相比之下，我覺得用 element 更好） in school assessment. Fewer students in each class share the resources, and, in the meantime, each is taken more care of by teachers, who, due to meritocracy （這個的短語在這里很莫名！！！） , are more accountable and learned, lifting the teaching efficiency and providing a better environment that is favorable for teenagers individuality development. In other words, they have to guarantee the teaching quality to enroll enough students, surviving the society （這里寫得有點混亂，不知道想表達什么意思！） .
Not only do private schools offer children a chance to receive education of a higher standard, but also fuel a rise, on the average, in the level of education. （這種句子多寫點，那么 8 分就跑不掉了，呵呵。。。非常好的句子！！！） Supposing that rapidly increasing students choose private schools rather than public ones, public schools, although they have annual limited education fund, are compelled to improve their education quality to ensure adequate applicants and escape the bad fortune closing their doors （估計又是受中文影響，寫出這樣的句子，稍微改改就對了） ,because of financial difficulties.
Most visibly, the blooming private schools justify the choice that children go to private ones （這句寫得很變扭，關鍵是想用 justify 這個詞后面加句子，所以導致的結果就是很不順。可以寫成： justify the students choice ，既簡潔又明了） . That paves the way for childrens promising future.
總評：大家可以看出這篇文章，紅點地方很多 ；藍的地方也有（因為寫得很好，可以學習）。
看下來的感覺是，作者的英語水平真的很不錯，寫成這樣真的已經很少人能做到了！那么有學生可能會問，寫得不錯怎么還那么多不妥的地方？！這就是為什么到現在也沒見有活人寫作考 9 分！因為，總是有這種或那種不妥之處！
此文 7 分。
